In Times Like These

In Times Like These ebook

“In Times Like These:  Love and danger, coast-to-coast!”

Carved jade pendant
“Jade is really the miracle stone, isn’t it?”

Page Wilburn has been depressed, mourning her father’s death and her own broken engagement. A friend treats her to a colorful outfit to cheer her up, and as they shop, Page just happens to utter the phrase that a group of spies expects their courier to say: “Jade is really the miracle stone, isn’t it?” A jade pendant carrying microfilmed secrets stolen from Page’s employer, Markham Electronics, is tucked into her dress box. When the spies realize she’s not really their courier, the action begins.

Vance Cooper, from the New York office, knows there is a leak at Markham Electronics. When a girl purporting to be his aunt’s goddaughter shows up all of a sudden, he decides that a fake fiancée would be just the ticket to keep the possible saboteur out of the house. Mr. Markham tabs Page for the job because of his friendship with her father.

“Mr. Cooper,” Markham said, “needs someone to do a highly confidential job.” He caught Page’s eyes and held them. “So important, Miss Wilburn, that if it were to be known to the wrong people it could do incalculable harm.”

Published in 1968, In Times Like These is a different style of ghostwritten book. The beginning is based on Emilie Loring’s 1921 short story, “The Box from Nixon’s,” but extra elements and characters were added to create a new and complicated plot of treason and undercover investigation.

Title, The Box from Nixon's

In the original story, Jean Wendell, too, is in mourning for her father, who died with a “wrecked fortune and a broken heart,” and for her own, “most disillusioning love affair.” A friend persuades her to accept a colorful outfit to cheer her up, but unbeknownst to Jean, the wrong box from Nixon’s clothing store is delivered.

Flagg illustration
“The gentleman insisted that this be delivered at once.”

She meets Miles Trevor for dinner, wearing the new dress, and both learn of an ad in the Lost and Found:


If the party who is in possession of the Nixon box which contained a café-au-lait crèpe de chine gown and a toque which matched in shade the jade green pendant, also in box, will return same to address below, no questions will be asked and suitable reward will be paid.

A fellow from Miles’ unit in the War warns him,

“That jade pendant is the master-key to some missing loot. If I can find out where that came from, the rest is a cinch. Now do you realize what your friend is up against?”

Jean learns about the mix-up in a phone call from her friend, and, embarrassed, slips out of the restaurant before she can be caught wearing someone else’s outfit. She’s in a predicament, for sure, but it falls far short of espionage!

Cover, Woman's Home Companion, May 1921

Emilie Loring wrote “The Box from Nixon’s” for Woman’s Home Companion, an up-to-date magazine of women’s interests. (You can read it here.)

Dress reform has arrived
“Our 1921 clothes are simple in cut, comfortable to wear, and admit of individual distinction.” Woman’s Home Companion

Women’s positive self-image was central to the magazine’s identity, and our first impression of Jean fits right in:

Curious that he had not recognized a girl whom he had seen every day for a month; but–he had seen her only in black, and now her clothes, oh boy, her clothes! But it was the change in her expression which had transformed her most. It was as if her spirit had escaped from bondage. Eyes which had been veiled and guarded were now softly, brilliantly friendly; lips which had escaped hardness were now irresistibly alluring.


Contrast this with the first impressions of Page Wilburn:

Her voice was as dull as Page herself, her body shapeless in the heavy mourning she wore, her mouth and cheeks pale, her eyes downcast. Even the heavy, honey-colored hair was drawn back so tightly one could almost feel the pull, and fastened in a big knot at the back of her head.

For the next thirty-plus pages, she accumulates negative descriptors: expressionless, bitter, hostile, mocking…

In spite of his dislike of fortune hunters, he couldn’t altogether blame the man who had been reluctant to marry this girl.

Both girls have been through a hard time. The difference is that Emilie Loring’s character, Jean, is sad, not bitter; disillusioned, not contemptuous.

“Somebody once said, ‘Tragedy is chic but discontent is dowdy.’  Now, I ask you, can you think of me as being dowdy?”  Hilltops Clear

In Times Like These paperbackLike Jean, Page’s appearance and mood are lifted when she gets her new outfit. Hallelujah!

“It’s customary to recognize your fiancée when you meet her.” Mischief danced in the blue eyes with their long lashes.

“Page!” he exclaimed. He thought in consternation, I wasn’t prepared for anything like this. What has happened to the girl? Why she’s a beauty.

In Times Like These is an interesting title, because both stories are products of their times, but in this case, the 1921 story is more modern in outlook than the 1968.

In “The Box from Nixon’s,” Jean and Miles are on equal footing in their humorous, flirtatious sparring:

The girl, her self-possession quite regained, laughed softly: “Run along, Lochinvar. Your western breeziness is so–so breath-snatching that I shall be glad of a respite in which to mobilize my forces to repel attack.”

He loomed over her as he warned,

“Better save your ammunition. You’re mine, and you can’t escape.”

Vance and Page, though, are the big man/little woman:

“Oh, Page! My darling little fool.”

Vance caught her against him, scolding her for taking idiotic chances, for general foolishness. Page, her cheek pressed against his, did not seem in the least offended.

Jean is the private secretary to the head of the company:

She had proved an expert in whipping obscurely expressed desires into documental shape.

Page, on the other hand, confesses,

“Frankly, I don’t even know the meaning of half the words that are dictated to me…”

And Vance Cooper’s Aunt Jane says,

“It seems to me that only by working in a shop or factory, in an office or at a profession, can a girl possibly understand the conditions under which the man she marries has to work. If she knew how hard it is to earn a living she would be more careful with his money; she would not expect the impossible of her husband.”

Hmmmm… I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that a woman didn’t write that.

Toque hat
They have a sense of purpose.

From book to book, Emilie’s characters have traditional jobs for women–secretary, office assistant, personal secretary–but in those roles, they prove not only competent but invaluable, and moreover, they have a sense of purpose.

In the same issue of Woman’s Home Companion, Ann Bryan McCall’s article, “Choosing Our Work,” expresses it well. She says that work is:

“…but a means of expression; a means of expressing and making real our ideals, our hearts’ dear desires, our very selves… It all comes down to this in the end–choosing not a career, but a purpose in life…I like to remember that the literal meaning of “profession” is ‘an open declaration, a public avowal or acknowledgement of one’s sentiments or beliefs.'”

Henry Ford said, that same year, “A young man should look for the single spark of individuality that makes him different, and develop that spark for all he’s worth.”

Then what would she do?

Something definite. Something worthwhile. I will decide what I want most, plan for it and go after it with all there is in me. Bill Damon has the right idea, I want to be an honored citizen who counts in the welfare of the nation.

To Love and to Honor

I have more in common with Emilie’s point of view in the 1920s than her ghostwriters’ in the 1960s. It’s more modern, more positive about women’s lives–more positive about life in general.

Nevertheless, In Times Like These is an absorbing mystery, and if you lived through the 1960s, references to hippies and Cold War espionage will take you back. It’s available as an e-book, so you can use your 21st-Century electronics to enjoy it!

Flower power sixties



7 thoughts on “In Times Like These

  1. I’m on EL novel #39. At this point, I’ve read my favorites of course. I have mostly the ghostwrittens and a few originals left to read. I don’t recall the books I am reading now. It is fun like reading something new of course.

    I am trying not to grouse about the “ghosties,” but here goes. “Throw Wide the Door,” like many ghosties starts off negative, with something deep, dark and forboding in the offing. Elinor loses a painting commission and finds her sister in law altered a check and overdrew Elinor’s account. She must go home. The hero, Steve Sewell, is remote and dark, brooding with some secret to hide, it seems. These set ups give me a sense of Jane Eyre and the dark, remote master of the home where she goes to work.

    There is little lighthearted interaction between the man and girl before she decides she’s deeply in love. Really? EL has the girl attracted to the man, noting he’s exciting, interesting, steadfast, or whatever, but not quickly hopelessly in love with a stranger as the ghosties often do. Some of these ghosties totally miss out on the joy and humor in EL novels. Some of the ghosties are more like suspense novels, always waiting for the other shoe to drop.

    In fairness, Elinor is more plucky than many ghostie heroines. But the ghost author has to TELL us what Elinor’s character is like (how she’s outgoing, or like her mother, fair, sweet, etc), whereas EL would show us through actions and character lines what the heroine and other characters are like. A good author doesn’t have to tell us outright about the characters. The character’s actions and words tell us.

    I feel better now. ;^D


    Liked by 2 people

    1. I’m glad for your comment about telling us what a character is like instead of letting the character show us herself. “Show, don’t tell” is one of the first writing lessons, and I find myself occasionally out of temper with books that do otherwise. 🙂 I feel better now, too.


      1. I am now a convert! I am nearly finished reading “In Times Like These.” The story is capturing my attention. it is suspenseful. I have a good guess as to who the baddies are, but it’s still a fun read. I have read it before but it’s been a long time.

        I now find I like Page. She was a sad pathetic character as her friend Leslie said, while in mourning. She picked it up pretty well and has some spunk and good sense about her. Not as silly as I remembered.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I love this one. Figuring out who the bad guys are was fun. The characters are well-written and the plot has lots of threads. I liked how Paige, btw, adore the name, goes undercover with Miles, love his name too.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Did you notice in one of Emilie’s books she describes a lady’s slender dress size as a 16? I asked my mom when I read that if dress sizes had changed since her younger years and she said no, as far as she knew dress sizes were always the same. I’m wondering if Emilie was accidentally referring to her own dress size because all art work from that time period portray young women as quite slender.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Happy Thanksgiving!!! I hear you about the mousy, less independent, less modern, less competent women in the Ghosties (that’s the word I’ve come up with for the ghostwritten EL books). They just can’t write like EL and don’t get it. I am set to read this one next. I recall Page Wilburn as being among the most pathetic leading ladies (I can’t call her a heroine.). The women are generally more passive in the ghosties. They don’t do things; things happen to them. I just read “No Time for Love.” Julie Ames was an embarrassing damsel in distress–as many ghostie heroines are–a direct targets of really bad guys. The aunt was ridiculous for taking the stand that Julie should not enter the business b/c she’ll want to marry and put all her energies into that. In 1970?!!!!! I am guessing that maybe the writers were afraid of losing EL’s traditional female audience if they sounded too feminist? The feminist movement was gaining in those days and upsetting a lot of tradition-minded people. But the idea that a girl is sentenced to the life of a helpless boring debutante at an aunt’s insistence in 1970 is just preposterous!

    Ideals of the feminine and masculine nature change with each generation. By way of example, I listened to a local movie reviewer, a male in his 30s, decry the Jurassic World 2016 movie (Chris Pratt). This young man thought Pratt’s character was way too masculine a hero; and the girl, a corporate woman, was not tough enough. I was surprised by such a viewpoint–still am a couple years later! I liked a tough heroic, masculine male lead. I thought the girl was spunky enough. She’s not an animal expert, but a corporate tough lady. She was no shrinking violet. The young male movie reviewer said the film set back male-female images decades!! (Yes, I’m older than the movie reviewer by a decade or more.) I still shake my head over that.

    Liked by 2 people

Please write your comment here.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s